The Public Advocate recently warned us not to “minimize the upfront risks and costs” of Pine Tree Power. Are people really able to overlook the more than $10 billion in debt and $500 million a year in interest this government takeover will likely cost us? The price tag alone is reason enough for me to vote no on Question 3.
Putting elected officials in charge of our electric grid seals my opposition. When I heard that, all I could picture was a bunch of politicians screaming at each other then posing for the cameras while powerlines fall to the ground around us.
We can’t let this happen to our state. Join me in voting no on Question 3.
Taylor Byrne
Winslow
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.